The full text of Columbia University’s President’s speech is available here, and it’s worth reading in its entirity. Someone had to say what Bollinger said. It makes me conclude that, on balance, Columbia’s decision to invite Ahmadinejad was a good thing.
Because of Bollinger’s no-holds-barred denunciation of Ahmadinejad, I find myself in agreement with today’s editorial in the New York Times:
There are many reasons we find Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s policies and pronouncements loathsome. High on that list are his denial of the Holocaust, his call to wipe Israel off the map and his country’s sponsorship of terrorism. Equally loathsome is Iran’s denial of basic civil rights to its citizens, including the right of free speech.So we are dismayed by the behavior of some of New York’s democratically elected representatives who denounced and threatened Columbia University for inviting the Iranian leader to speak there yesterday. We can imagine no better way to give hope to opponents of Iran’s repressive state than by showcasing America’s democracy and commitment to free speech. And we can imagine no better way to lay bare the bankruptcy of Mr. Ahmadinejad’s views than to have him speak, and be questioned, at a university forum.
Columbia’s president, Lee Bollinger, defended the event as in the best tradition of America’s free speech, then freely told Mr. Ahmadinejad: You exhibit all the signs of a petty and cruel dictator. Mr. Ahmadinejad said he would not be affected by this unfriendly treatment and did a lot of bobbing and weaving. He showed his colors when, asked about Iran’s repression of homosexuals, he declared: “We don’t have homosexuals like in your country,” setting off hoots and derisive laughter.
Unlike Iran’s citizens, Americans have the right to laugh at leaders, as well as protest Mr. Ahmadinejad’s visit and Columbia’s decision to schedule his speech. The threats of possible sanctions against Columbia were an insult to that freedom. In an interview with The New York Sun, the speaker of New York’s Assembly, Sheldon Silver, warned that legislators might now take a different view of capital support provided to Columbia.
We hope cooler heads prevail once Mr. Ahmadinejad leaves town. And we hope that what Americans and Iranians will remember is that image of professors and students, in a true democratic forum, challenging the Iranian president for his Holocaust denial, his threats against Israel and the repression of Iran’s citizens.
On occasion, the Times gets it right.
Lee Bollinger and Columbia University speaking program decision-makers are educated idiots. It is difficult to imagine any worse judgement by any USA institutional leader, inviting an avowed enemy to speak out.
One does not give any dangerous person and enemy who espouses hatred, death, destruction, and is a legitimate threat to the safety of our country and the free western civilized world, a worldwide platform to express and openly promote his twisted views to be heard by millions, if not eventually billions. The problem is that a radical minority of similar listeners will respond, and may act out his deadly views. No amount of notoriety gained, nor criticism levelled upon introduction and closing, nor “hard questioning” is worth allowing a known terrorist, enemy of our people, country, allies, and culture, and true danger to our world to spread his despicable message. Regardless of intent, we lose by hyping HIS message. STUPIDITY.
“I have seen the enemy, and He is Us
”
The Major
The problem with free speech, we all so much believe in, can be used like this, to greatly harm ourselves.
Jim,
I understand where you’re coming from, and, in many cases, I would agree with it. However, in this instance, there are two special factors: (1) Ahmadinejad is such a blathering idiot that I’m not really concerned that he’ll persuade any Americans of the righteousness of his cause (as a propagandist, he’s miles away from a Hitler); and (2) Bollinger’s speech was far and away better than anything I’ve heard from the Bush (or any previous) administration.
So I have to respectfully disagree with you that letting him speak will harm us.
Marc,
I don’t believe the US was the target of Ahmedinijad’s speech. I think he wanted to reach the Muslim world and use this event in the controlled media of that world. People in the US have ample opportunity to inform themselves about Ahmedinijad’s views. Not so the many illiterates in the Muslim world. Ahmedinijad successfully used this to promote his image as one who speaks truth to power and at the same time is a man of peace.
Bollinger is a holier than thou idiot who has been educated beyond his intelligence.