Want the dirty details on Murtha? Then read an op-ed in the WSJ’s OpinionJournal that concludes with this paragraph:

Gary Ruskin, director of the liberal Congressional Accountability Project, told Roll Call that “when it comes to institutional policing of corruption in Congress, John Murtha is a one-man wrecking crew.” Now with the support of Ms. Pelosi, that “wrecking crew” stands just one ballot away from becoming House majority leader. Should he win the sealed-ballot election of his peers tomorrow, Democrats may have a hard time explaining just what has changed regarding the Congress’s “culture of corruption.”

Both the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal have now weighed in against Murtha. And what have we heard from that guardian of propriety in American politics? The New York Times has said nary a word. The Times is stuck between Iraq and a hard place. Having fallen all over itself praising Murtha for his stance on Iraq, can it now do a 180 and repeat—or at the very least—try to refute the charges against Murtha? A very hard place, indeed. The kind of place that might lead some to question the Times’ integrity. What a shame that would be.