In today’s Washington Post, Dana Priest reports that U.S. intelligence and terrorism experts say they believe Iran would respond to U.S. military strikes on its nuclear sites by deploying its intelligence operatives and Hezbollah teams to carry out terrorist attacks worldwide. Iran would mount attacks against U.S. targets inside Iraq, where Iranian intelligence agents are already plentiful, predicted these experts. There is also a growing consensus that Iran’s agents would target civilians in the United States, Europe and elsewhere. [emphasis added]

If these reports are accurate, we have two choices. The first is to allow ourselves to be blackmailed by not taking military action as a last resort to prevent Iran from going nuclear. If we allow ourselves to be blackmailed by an Iran that is not yet a nuclear power, imagine how easy it would be for the mullahs to blackmail us after Iran has the Bomb. The second is to serve notice that, if our civilians are attacked, we will respond in kind. As distasteful as the second option is, it’s better than the first. The long-standing policy of the U.S. is that we don’t negotiate with terrorists. A corollary to this policy should be that we will not allow our national security policies to be determined by the threat of terrorist actions.