Back on December 23, I took note of an article in the Washington Times regarding a “treasure trove” of documents from Iraq stored in a warehouse in the Persian Gulf, most of which had not been translated.
Judged by an article in the January 16 issue of The Weekly Standard, the small percentage of the documents that have been translated has yielded some very interesting information:
THE FORMER IRAQI REGIME OF Saddam Hussein trained thousands of radical Islamic terrorists from the region at camps in Iraq over the four years immediately preceding the U.S. invasion, according to documents and photographs recovered by the U.S. military in postwar Iraq. The existence and character of these documents has been confirmed to THE WEEKLY STANDARD by eleven U.S. government officials.
The secret training took place primarily at three camps—in Samarra, Ramadi, and Salman Pak—and was directed by elite Iraqi military units. Interviews by U.S. government interrogators with Iraqi regime officials and military leaders corroborate the documentary evidence. Many of the fighters were drawn from terrorist groups in northern Africa with close ties to al Qaeda, chief among them Algeria’s GSPC and the Sudanese Islamic Army. Some 2,000 terrorists were trained at these Iraqi camps each year from 1999 to 2002, putting the total number at or above 8,000. Intelligence officials believe that some of these terrorists returned to Iraq and are responsible for attacks against Americans and Iraqis. According to three officials with knowledge of the intelligence on Iraqi training camps, White House and National Security Council officials were briefed on these findings in May 2005; senior Defense Department officials subsequently received the same briefing.
The photographs and documents on Iraqi training camps come from a collection of some 2 million “exploitable items” captured in postwar Iraq and Afghanistan. They include handwritten notes, typed documents, audiotapes, videotapes, compact discs, floppy discs, and computer hard drives. Taken together, this collection could give U.S. intelligence officials and policymakers an inside look at the activities of the former Iraqi regime in the months and years before the Iraq war.
The discovery of the information on jihadist training camps in Iraq would seem to have two major consequences: It exposes the flawed assumptions of the experts and U.S. intelligence officials who told us for years that a secularist like Saddam Hussein would never work with Islamic radicals, any more than such jihadists would work with an infidel like the Iraqi dictator. It also reminds us that valuable information remains buried in the mountain of documents recovered in Afghanistan and Iraq over the past four years.
What needs to be explained is why, in light of the May 2005 briefings, has the Bush Administration chosen not to make this information public? The answer, according to a Pentagon spokesman quoted in the article, is that the mainstream press might cherry-pick documents and mischaracterize their meaning.
There is always the concern that people would be chasing a lot of information good or bad, and when the Times or the Post splashes a headline about some sensational-sounding document that would seem to ‘prove’ that sanctions were working, or that Saddam was just a misunderstood patriot, or some other nonsense, we’d spend a lot of time chasing around after it.
In view of recent events, this seems like a legitimate concern.
Darn right it’s a legitimate concern. Although the Bush Administration did use things other than WMD to justify the invasion, it did make WMD the center of it’s case publicy. This, in retrospect, was a mistake, as we both would agree. Of course hindsight is always 20/20
What puzzles me, like you, is why they haven’t trumpeted this link to terrorism more in the days since the invasion. But then their entire communication and ‘getting out the message’ to the public is wanting all around. Reagan Bush isn’t.
What really bugs me is that so may writers have written extensively about these links between Saddam and terror. Stephone Hayes has an entire book out about it. Richard Miniter, Deroy Murdock, and Christopher Hitchens are other writers who come to mind.
Of course, most of the msm completely ignore all this.
I dunno – the explanation for why it isn’t publishing such information seems pretty weak. Perhaps the groups in question are “Al-Queda connected” in the couple-of-degrees way, not in the way the Weekly Standard implies?
[...] American Future asks why the Bush administration isn’t making this information public. [...]
Given the faux-controversy about domestic spying, is this Bush’s ace-up-his-sleeve?
Secret Iraqi Documents – Still Untouched
According to the story Saddam’s Terror Training Camps in the 16 January issue of The weekly Standard, translation of just a few of some of the nearly 2 million documents captured during in Iraq and Afghanistan tell a compelling story of how the I …...
[...] “I still believe there are key individuals who have not been debriefed and there are key sites that have never been investigated. I know there are 35,000 boxes of documents that have never been translated. I am frustrated,” Mr. Hoekstra said. This entry is filed under Iraq, WMD. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Leave a Reply [...]