<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Once Wrong Doesn&#8217;t Mean Always Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://americanfuture.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528</link>
	<description>Marc Schulman on a world in turmoil</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: penis enlargement</title>
		<link>http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528#comment-304384</link>
		<dc:creator>penis enlargement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528#comment-304384</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;penis enlargement...&lt;/strong&gt;

penis enlargement...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>penis enlargement&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>penis enlargement&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soccer &#187; Blog Archives &#187; A day out of the office and into the field</title>
		<link>http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528#comment-136208</link>
		<dc:creator>Soccer &#187; Blog Archives &#187; A day out of the office and into the field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528#comment-136208</guid>
		<description>[...] American Future takes on the rather silly meme that argues that if one was wrong about the Iraq War, one&#8217;s opinion should never again be heeded. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] American Future takes on the rather silly meme that argues that if one was wrong about the Iraq War, one&#8217;s opinion should never again be heeded. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</title>
		<link>http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528#comment-135883</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528#comment-135883</guid>
		<description>[...] American Future, â€œOnce Wrong Doesn&#8217;t Mean Always Wrongâ€ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] American Future, &#226;&#8364;&#339;Once Wrong Doesn&#8217;t Mean Always Wrong&#226;&#8364; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soccer dad</title>
		<link>http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528#comment-131213</link>
		<dc:creator>soccer dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528#comment-131213</guid>
		<description>Your observation about Halberstan is interesting because Victor Davis Hanson makes a similar observation about Bob Woodward &lt;a href="http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/4884441.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your observation about Halberstan is interesting because Victor Davis Hanson makes a similar observation about Bob Woodward <a href="http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/4884441.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nykrindc</title>
		<link>http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528#comment-131195</link>
		<dc:creator>nykrindc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528#comment-131195</guid>
		<description>I don't know if people dismiss neo cons out of hand simply because they supported and pushed for the invasion of Iraq. I think the dismissal comes more from listening to many of them continuing to make the same defeated arguments (or in the case of the VP, same arguments that have been proven to be incorrect) and using these as a foundation for their more recent recommendations. The question most people naturally ask is, how can a proposal based on arguments and perceptions that have been proven to be incorrect, be useful?

I think people are more inclined to listen to those people who have acknowledged their mistakes but have sought to find a way forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if people dismiss neo cons out of hand simply because they supported and pushed for the invasion of Iraq. I think the dismissal comes more from listening to many of them continuing to make the same defeated arguments (or in the case of the VP, same arguments that have been proven to be incorrect) and using these as a foundation for their more recent recommendations. The question most people naturally ask is, how can a proposal based on arguments and perceptions that have been proven to be incorrect, be useful?</p>
<p>I think people are more inclined to listen to those people who have acknowledged their mistakes but have sought to find a way forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael B</title>
		<link>http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528#comment-129579</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanfuture.net/?p=2528#comment-129579</guid>
		<description>To put it in modest terms indeed, Halberstam's earlier "hawkishness" can be variously critiqued and probed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put it in modest terms indeed, Halberstam&#8217;s earlier &#8220;hawkishness&#8221; can be variously critiqued and probed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
